runwayinuse

08C Riverview

14
PROBABLE 60%

Runway 14 — wind slightly favors it, low confidence

Based mostly on wind; no traffic or ATIS to confirm. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. ADS-B tracking just started here — traffic history is still building.

certainty: 60% evidence: NONE no tower now

N 14 32

Wind 160° true at 3 kt · VFR · 47 min old · from KGRR (12.8 nm away)

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

14 59% 3920 ft · 3 kt head, 1 kt x-right
32 41% 3920 ft · 3 kt TAIL, 1 kt x-left
Why — evidence behind this answer

Runway 14

Runway 32

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METAROK 47 min Nearest station KGRR (12.8 nm away)
ADSBWARMING_UP 2242 min Only 0 min of track history so far
NOTAMOK
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (Only 0 min of track history so far)

Was this right?

08C field & runways

Riverview, Jenison, Michigan. Field elevation 603 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT).

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.014°/year west — about 1° every 71 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
14 139.2° 144.8° matches rule gives runway 15 in ~11 yr 3,920 ft ASPH left
32 319.2° 324.8° matches rule gives runway 33 in ~11 yr 3,920 ft ASPH

Generated 08:39:35Z · auto-refreshes · JSON