runwayinuse

33U Dutch John

?
UNKNOWN

Unknown — not enough evidence to call a runway

We don't know, and saying so beats guessing. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. No ADS-B traffic data available. No weather observation available.

certainty: — evidence: NONE no tower now

N 11 29

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

11 26% 6000 ft
29 26% 6000 ft
25 24% 4450 ft
7 24% 4450 ft
Why — evidence behind this answer

Runway 11

Runway 29

Runway 25

Runway 7

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METARUNAVAILABLE No weather observation found
ADSBUNAVAILABLE No ADS-B track history here yet
NOTAMOK
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (No ADS-B track history here yet)

Was this right?

33U field & runways

Dutch John, Dutch John, Utah. Field elevation 6561 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT). Magnetic variation 14.0°E on record, 9.7°E today.

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.086°/year west — about 1° every 12 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
11 123.7° 114.0° matches rule gives runway 12 in ~12 yr 6,000 ft ASPH left
25 not published — 4,450 ft DIRT
29 303.7° 294.0° matches rule gives runway 30 in ~12 yr 6,000 ft ASPH left
7 not published — 4,450 ft DIRT

Generated 10:19:21Z · auto-refreshes · JSON