runwayinuse

6G5 Barnesville/Bradfield

?
UNKNOWN

Unknown — not enough evidence to call a runway

We don't know, and saying so beats guessing. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. No ADS-B traffic data available. No weather observation available.

certainty: — evidence: NONE no tower now

N 27 9

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

27 50% 4003 ft
9 50% 4003 ft

Active NOTAMs affecting runways

LIGHTING RWY 27 until 03-18 21:11Z
RWY 27 RWY END ID LGT U/S
Why — evidence behind this answer

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METARUNAVAILABLE No weather observation found
ADSBUNAVAILABLE No ADS-B track history here yet
NOTAMOK
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (No ADS-B track history here yet)

Was this right?

6G5 field & runways

Barnesville/Bradfield, Barnesville, Ohio. Field elevation 1312 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT). Magnetic variation 8.0°W on record, 8.4°W today.

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.008°/year west — about 1° every 125 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
27 266.4° 274.8° matches rule gives runway 28 in ~23 yr 4,003 ft ASPH left
9 86.4° 94.8° matches rule gives runway 10 in ~23 yr 4,003 ft ASPH left

Generated 09:14:32Z · auto-refreshes · JSON