7AR7 Riddell Fld

UNKNOWN

No runway-in-use estimate is possible here

The FAA's NASR data publishes no runway alignment for this field, so there is nothing to compute a wind component against and no way to tell which end an aircraft used. What is known about the field is below.

We don't know, and saying so beats guessing. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. No ADS-B traffic data available. No weather observation available.

certainty: — evidence: NONE no tower now

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

17 25% 2500 ft

18 25% 2200 ft

35 25% 2500 ft

36 25% 2200 ft

Why — evidence behind this answer

Sources consulted

source	status	note
D_ATIS	UNAVAILABLE	No D-ATIS at this field
METAR	UNAVAILABLE	No weather observation found
ADSB	UNAVAILABLE	No ADS-B track history here yet
NOTAM	OK
CIFP	NOT_CONFIGURED	Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (No ADS-B track history here yet)

Was this right?

7AR7 field & runways

Riddell Fld, Elaine, Arkansas. Field elevation 169 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT). Private use.

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.07°/year west — about 1° every 14 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against *today's* declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
Runway	True	Number	Length	Surface
17	not published	—	2,500 ft	ASPH
18	not published	—	2,200 ft	TURF
35	not published	—	2,500 ft	ASPH
36	not published	—	2,200 ft	TURF

Generated 09:45:38Z · auto-refreshes · JSON