runwayinuse

7IL3 Flying Q Farm

?
UNKNOWN

Unknown — not enough evidence to call a runway

We don't know, and saying so beats guessing. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. ADS-B tracking just started here — traffic history is still building. Wind calm — no directional preference.

certainty: — evidence: NONE no tower now

N 27 9

Wind calm · VFR · 16 min old · from KBUU (27.3 nm away)

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

27 50% 1717 ft
9 50% 1717 ft
Why — evidence behind this answer

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METAROK 16 min Nearest station KBUU (27.3 nm away)
ADSBWARMING_UP 2496 min Only 0 min of track history so far
NOTAMOK
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (Only 0 min of track history so far)

Was this right?

7IL3 field & runways

Flying Q Farm, Marengo, Illinois. Field elevation 860 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT). Private use.

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.032°/year west — about 1° every 31 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
27 270.0° 273.5° matches rule gives runway 28 in ~46 yr 1,717 ft TURF
9 90.0° 93.5° matches rule gives runway 10 in ~46 yr 1,717 ft TURF

Generated 09:50:34Z · auto-refreshes · JSON