runwayinuse

A39 Ak-Chin Rgnl

?
UNKNOWN

Unknown — not enough evidence to call a runway

We don't know, and saying so beats guessing. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. No weather observation available.

certainty: — evidence: NONE no tower now

N 22 4

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

22 50% 4751 ft
4 50% 4751 ft
Why — evidence behind this answer

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METARUNAVAILABLE No weather observation found
ADSBOK 56 min MODERATE
NOTAMOK
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour.

Was this right?

A39 field & runways

Ak-Chin Rgnl, Maricopa, Arizona. Field elevation 1307 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT). Magnetic variation 12.0°E on record, 9.5°E today.

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.075°/year west — about 1° every 13 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
22 227.8° 218.3° matches 4,751 ft ASPH
4 47.8° 38.3° matches 4,751 ft ASPH

What A39 usually does

Of 1,747 operations this service has observed at A39 since 2026-08-25:

Observed by this service only — not an FAA statistic, and biased toward the hours and days it has been watching. It is shown because it is the same history the engine learns its local-convention prior from.

Generated 10:19:09Z · auto-refreshes · JSON