runwayinuse

KJQF Concord-Padgett Rgnl

?
UNKNOWN

Unknown — not enough evidence to call a runway

We don't know, and saying so beats guessing. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. No ADS-B traffic data available. Weather observation is 5731 minutes old — treat with caution. Wind calm — no directional preference.

certainty: — evidence: NONE Class D

N 2 20

Wind calm · VFR · 5731 min old

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

2 50% 7402 ft
20 50% 7402 ft
Why — evidence behind this answer

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METAROK 5731 min
ADSBUNAVAILABLE No ADS-B track history here yet
NOTAMOK
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (No ADS-B track history here yet)

Was this right?

KJQF field & runways

Concord-Padgett Rgnl, Concord, North Carolina. Field elevation 704 ft. Class D airspace. Towered. Magnetic variation 6.0°W on record, 8.1°W today.

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.035°/year west — about 1° every 29 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
2 10.4° 18.5° matches 7,402 ft ASPH
20 190.4° 198.5° matches 7,402 ft ASPH ILS

Generated 09:46:04Z · auto-refreshes · JSON