runwayinuse

KPEZ Pleasanton Muni

?
UNKNOWN

Unknown — not enough evidence to call a runway

We don't know, and saying so beats guessing. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. No ADS-B traffic data available. Weather observation is 5008 minutes old — treat with caution.

certainty: — evidence: NONE no tower now

N 34 16

Wind 030° true at 8 kt · VFR · 5008 min old

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

34 50% 4000 ft · 6 kt head, 6 kt x-right
16 50% 4000 ft · 6 kt TAIL, 6 kt x-left

Active NOTAMs affecting runways

LIGHTING RWY 34 until 01-20 21:11Z
RWY 34 PAPI U/S
Why — evidence behind this answer

Runway 34

Runway 16

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METAROK 5008 min
ADSBUNAVAILABLE No ADS-B track history here yet
NOTAMOK
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (No ADS-B track history here yet)

Was this right?

KPEZ field & runways

Pleasanton Muni, Pleasanton, Texas. Field elevation 430 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT). Magnetic variation 6.0°E on record, 3.5°E today.

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.079°/year west — about 1° every 13 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
16 163.2° 159.7° matches 4,000 ft ASPH left
34 343.2° 339.7° matches 4,000 ft ASPH left

Generated 10:23:13Z · auto-refreshes · JSON