runwayinuse

KSLR Sulphur Springs Muni

?
UNKNOWN

Unknown — not enough evidence to call a runway

We don't know, and saying so beats guessing. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. ADS-B tracking just started here — traffic history is still building. Weather observation is 6889 minutes old — treat with caution. Wind calm — no directional preference.

certainty: — evidence: NONE no tower now

N 1 19

Wind calm · IFR · 6889 min old

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

1 50% 5001 ft
19 50% 5001 ft
Why — evidence behind this answer

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METAROK 6889 min
ADSBWARMING_UP 684 min Only 0 min of track history so far
NOTAMOK
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (Only 0 min of track history so far)

Was this right?

KSLR field & runways

Sulphur Springs Muni, Sulphur Springs, Texas. Field elevation 489 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT). Magnetic variation 3.0°E on record, 1.8°E today.

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.077°/year west — about 1° every 13 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
1 9.6° 7.8° matches 5,001 ft CONC
19 189.6° 187.8° matches 5,001 ft CONC

Generated 09:44:01Z · auto-refreshes · JSON