OR39 Flying Tom
No runway-in-use estimate is possible here
The FAA's NASR data publishes no runway alignment for this field, so there is nothing to compute a wind component against and no way to tell which end an aircraft used. What is known about the field is below.
We don't know, and saying so beats guessing. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. No ADS-B traffic data available.
certainty: — evidence: NONE no tower now
Wind 300° true at 4 kt · VFR · 57 min old · from KMMV (32.5 nm away)
▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself
Why — evidence behind this answer
Sources consulted
| source | status | age | note |
|---|---|---|---|
| D_ATIS | UNAVAILABLE | No D-ATIS at this field | |
| METAR | OK | 57 min | Nearest station KMMV (32.5 nm away) |
| ADSB | UNAVAILABLE | No ADS-B track history here yet | |
| NOTAM | OK | ||
| CIFP | NOT_CONFIGURED | Instrument procedures: phase 4 |
Recent operations
No operations observed in the last hour. (No ADS-B track history here yet)
Was this right?
OR39 field & runways
Flying Tom, Corvallis, Oregon. Field elevation 300 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT). Private use. Magnetic variation 19.0°E on record, 14.4°E today.
The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.113°/year west — about 1° every 9 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.
| Runway | True | Magnetic | Number | Length | Surface | Pattern | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 | not published | — | 1,600 ft | TURF-GRVL | |||
| 34 | not published | — | 1,600 ft | TURF-GRVL |
Generated 09:50:10Z · auto-refreshes · JSON