runwayinuse

T30 Mc Kinley Fld

?
UNKNOWN

Unknown — not enough evidence to call a runway

We don't know, and saying so beats guessing. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. ADS-B tracking just started here — traffic history is still building. No weather observation available.

certainty: — evidence: NONE no tower now

N 13 31

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

13 50% 5027 ft
31 50% 5027 ft
Why — evidence behind this answer

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METARUNAVAILABLE No weather observation found
ADSBWARMING_UP 3404 min Only 0 min of track history so far
NOTAMOK
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (Only 0 min of track history so far)

Was this right?

T30 field & runways

Mc Kinley Fld, Pearsall, Texas. Field elevation 586 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT). Magnetic variation 7.0°E on record, 3.8°E today.

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.078°/year west — about 1° every 13 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
13 137.3° 133.5° matches rule gives runway 14 in ~19 yr 5,027 ft ASPH left
31 317.3° 313.5° matches rule gives runway 32 in ~19 yr 5,027 ft ASPH left

Generated 09:43:52Z · auto-refreshes · JSON