runwayinuse

U94 Hazelton Muni

6
WIND_INFERRED 90%

Runway 6 — favored by the wind (12 kt at 70° true)

Based on wind only — no traffic or ATIS to confirm. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. No ADS-B traffic data available.

certainty: 90% evidence: WEAK no tower now

N 6 24

Wind 070° true at 12 kt · VFR · 39 min old · from KGNG (34.5 nm away)

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

6 99% 3163 ft · 12 kt head, 1 kt x-left
24 <1% 3163 ft · 12 kt TAIL, 1 kt x-right
Why — evidence behind this answer

Runway 6

Runway 24

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METAROK 39 min Nearest station KGNG (34.5 nm away)
ADSBUNAVAILABLE No ADS-B track history here yet
NOTAMOK
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (No ADS-B track history here yet)

Was this right?

U94 field & runways

Hazelton Muni, Hazelton, Idaho. Field elevation 4172 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT). Magnetic variation 16.0°E on record, 11.8°E today.

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.094°/year west — about 1° every 11 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
24 254.9° 243.2° matches rule gives runway 25 in ~20 yr 3,163 ft ASPH left
6 74.9° 63.2° matches rule gives runway 7 in ~20 yr 3,163 ft ASPH left

Generated 09:13:46Z · auto-refreshes · JSON