W28 Sequim Valley
Unknown — not enough evidence to call a runway
We don't know, and saying so beats guessing. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. ADS-B tracking just started here — traffic history is still building. No weather observation available.
certainty: — evidence: NONE no tower now
▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself
Active NOTAMs affecting runways
RWY 09/27 CLSD
Why — evidence behind this answer
Runway 27
- NOTAM 27 not considered — closed by NOTAM until 2359Z 12 Oct
Runway 9
- NOTAM 9 not considered — closed by NOTAM until 2359Z 12 Oct
Sources consulted
| source | status | age | note |
|---|---|---|---|
| D_ATIS | UNAVAILABLE | No D-ATIS at this field | |
| METAR | UNAVAILABLE | No weather observation found | |
| ADSB | WARMING_UP | 588 min | Only 0 min of track history so far |
| NOTAM | OK | ||
| CIFP | NOT_CONFIGURED | Instrument procedures: phase 4 |
Recent operations
No operations observed in the last hour. (Only 0 min of track history so far)
Was this right?
W28 field & runways
Sequim Valley, Sequim, Washington. Field elevation 151 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT). Magnetic variation 21.0°E on record, 15.1°E today.
The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.127°/year west — about 1° every 8 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.
| Runway | True | Magnetic | Number | Length | Surface | Pattern | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 | 287.2° | 272.1° | matches rule gives runway 28 in ~22 yr | 3,508 ft | ASPH | CLOSED | |
| 9 | 107.2° | 92.1° | matches rule gives runway 10 in ~22 yr | 3,508 ft | ASPH | right | CLOSED |
Generated 10:21:12Z · auto-refreshes · JSON