runwayinuse

XA49 Blue Jay Airfield

?
UNKNOWN

Unknown — not enough evidence to call a runway

We don't know, and saying so beats guessing. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency.

certainty: — evidence: NONE no tower now

N 14 32

Wind 060° true at 5 kt · VFR · 11 min old · from KADS (23.0 nm away)

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

14 52% 1637 ft · 0 kt head, 5 kt x-left
32 48% 1637 ft · 0 kt TAIL, 5 kt x-right
Why — evidence behind this answer

Runway 14

Runway 32

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METAROK 11 min Nearest station KADS (23.0 nm away)
ADSBOK 2 min GOOD
NOTAMOK
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour.

Was this right?

XA49 field & runways

Blue Jay Airfield, Justin, Texas. Field elevation 668 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT). Private use.

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.077°/year west — about 1° every 13 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
14 144.1° 141.3° matches rule gives runway 15 in ~48 yr 1,637 ft TURF
32 324.1° 321.3° matches rule gives runway 33 in ~48 yr 1,637 ft TURF

Generated 10:57:58Z · auto-refreshes · JSON