runwayinuse

0O4 Corning Muni

35
PROBABLE 60%

Runway 35 — wind slightly favors it, low confidence

Based mostly on wind; no traffic or ATIS to confirm. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. ADS-B tracking just started here — traffic history is still building.

certainty: 60% evidence: NONE no tower now

N 35 17

Wind 350° true at 3 kt · VFR · 49 min old · from KRDD (34.6 nm away)

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

35 59% 2699 ft · 3 kt head, 0 kt x-left · right traffic
17 41% 2699 ft · 3 kt TAIL, 0 kt x-right
Why — evidence behind this answer

Runway 35

Runway 17

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METAROK 49 min Nearest station KRDD (34.6 nm away)
ADSBWARMING_UP 2382 min Only 0 min of track history so far
NOTAMOK
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (Only 0 min of track history so far)

Was this right?

0O4 field & runways

Corning Muni, Corning, California. Field elevation 295 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT). Magnetic variation 17.0°E on record, 13.2°E today.

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.096°/year west — about 1° every 10 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
17 180.0° 166.7° matches 2,699 ft ASPH left
35 360.0° 346.7° matches 2,699 ft ASPH right

Generated 08:41:52Z · auto-refreshes · JSON