runwayinuse

29ID Patterson Fld

12
WIND_INFERRED 90%

Runway 12 — favored by the wind (10 kt at 130° true)

Based on wind only — no traffic or ATIS to confirm. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. ADS-B tracking just started here — traffic history is still building.

certainty: 90% evidence: WEAK no tower now

N 12 30

Wind 130° true at 10 kt · VFR · 51 min old · from KBOI (26.3 nm away)

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

12 99% 1724 ft · 10 kt head, 0 kt x-left · right traffic
30 <1% 1724 ft · 10 kt TAIL, 0 kt x-right
Why — evidence behind this answer

Runway 12

Runway 30

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METAROK 51 min Nearest station KBOI (26.3 nm away)
ADSBWARMING_UP 99 min Only 0 min of track history so far
NOTAMOK
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (Only 0 min of track history so far)

Was this right?

29ID field & runways

Patterson Fld, Emmett, Idaho. Field elevation 2297 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT). Private use.

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.101°/year west — about 1° every 10 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
12 132.3° 119.5° matches 1,724 ft ASPH right
30 312.3° 299.5° matches 1,724 ft ASPH

Generated 09:44:22Z · auto-refreshes · JSON