runwayinuse

9W9 Clio Crop Care

5
PROBABLE 60%

Runway 5 — wind slightly favors it, low confidence

Based mostly on wind; no traffic or ATIS to confirm. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. ADS-B tracking just started here — traffic history is still building.

certainty: 60% evidence: NONE no tower now

N 5 23

Wind 350° true at 4 kt · VFR · 62 min old · from KUDG (18.7 nm away)

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

5 58% 2598 ft · 2 kt head, 3 kt x-left
23 42% 2598 ft · 2 kt TAIL, 3 kt x-right
Why — evidence behind this answer

Runway 5

Runway 23

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METAROK 62 min Nearest station KUDG (18.7 nm away)
ADSBWARMING_UP 2403 min Only 0 min of track history so far
NOTAMOK
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (Only 0 min of track history so far)

Was this right?

9W9 field & runways

Clio Crop Care, Clio, South Carolina. Field elevation 192 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT). Magnetic variation 6.0°W on record, 8.7°W today.

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.035°/year west — about 1° every 29 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
23 224.1° 232.8° matches 2,598 ft TURF left
5 44.0° 52.8° matches 2,598 ft TURF

Generated 10:57:43Z · auto-refreshes · JSON