runwayinuse

KSGR Sugar Land Rgnl

35
PROBABLE 68%

Runway 35 — wind slightly favors it, low confidence

Based mostly on wind; no traffic or ATIS to confirm. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. No ADS-B traffic data available.

certainty: 68% evidence: NONE Class D

N 35 17

Wind 350° true at 4 kt · VFR · 59 min old · from KARM (34.1 nm away)

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

35 67% 8000 ft · 4 kt head, 0 kt x-left
17 33% 8000 ft · 4 kt TAIL, 0 kt x-right
Why — evidence behind this answer

Runway 35

Runway 17

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METAROK 59 min Nearest station KARM (34.1 nm away)
ADSBUNAVAILABLE No ADS-B track history here yet
NOTAMOK
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (No ADS-B track history here yet)

Was this right?

KSGR field & runways

Sugar Land Rgnl, Houston, Texas. Field elevation 81 ft. Class D airspace. Towered. Magnetic variation 5.0°E on record, 1.9°E today.

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.08°/year west — about 1° every 12 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
17 175.3° 173.4° matches rule gives runway 18 in ~20 yr 8,000 ft CONC
35 355.3° 353.4° matches rule gives runway 36 in ~20 yr 8,000 ft CONC left ILS

Generated 09:13:52Z · auto-refreshes · JSON