runwayinuse

LS88 Kreswell

?
UNKNOWN

Unknown — not enough evidence to call a runway

We don't know, and saying so beats guessing. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. ADS-B tracking just started here — traffic history is still building.

certainty: — evidence: NONE no tower now

N 32 14

Wind 040° true at 4 kt · VFR · 74 min old · from KIYA (31.1 nm away)

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

32 52% 2029 ft · 1 kt head, 4 kt x-right
14 48% 2029 ft · 1 kt TAIL, 4 kt x-left
Why — evidence behind this answer

Runway 32

Runway 14

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METAROK 74 min Nearest station KIYA (31.1 nm away)
ADSBWARMING_UP 681 min Only 0 min of track history so far
NOTAMOK
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (Only 0 min of track history so far)

Was this right?

LS88 field & runways

Kreswell, Eunice, Louisiana. Field elevation 42 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT). Private use.

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.08°/year west — about 1° every 12 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
14 143.0° 143.2° matches rule gives runway 15 in ~23 yr 2,029 ft TURF
32 323.0° 323.2° matches rule gives runway 33 in ~23 yr 2,029 ft TURF

Generated 09:49:27Z · auto-refreshes · JSON