runwayinuse

MN24 Surfside

?
UNKNOWN

Unknown — not enough evidence to call a runway

We don't know, and saying so beats guessing. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. ADS-B tracking just started here — traffic history is still building.

certainty: — evidence: NONE no tower now

N 22 4

Wind 130° true at 6 kt · VFR · 26 min old · from KMSP (17.2 nm away)

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

22 51% 1900 ft · 0 kt head, 6 kt x-left
4 49% 1900 ft · 0 kt TAIL, 6 kt x-right
Why — evidence behind this answer

Runway 22

Runway 4

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METAROK 26 min Nearest station KMSP (17.2 nm away)
ADSBWARMING_UP 3305 min Only 0 min of track history so far
NOTAMOK
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (Only 0 min of track history so far)

Was this right?

MN24 field & runways

Surfside, Lino Lakes, Minnesota. Field elevation 890 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT). Private use. Magnetic variation 3.0°E on record, 0.3°W today.

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.039°/year west — about 1° every 26 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
22 218.6° 218.8° matches 1,900 ft TURF left
4 38.6° 38.8° matches 1,900 ft TURF left

Generated 10:19:12Z · auto-refreshes · JSON