runwayinuse

PAJC Chignik

?
UNKNOWN

Unknown — not enough evidence to call a runway

We don't know, and saying so beats guessing. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. No ADS-B traffic data available. Weather observation is 53444 minutes old — treat with caution.

certainty: — evidence: NONE no tower now

N 2 20

Wind 250° true at 19 kt G27 · VFR · 53444 min old

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

2 50% 2600 ft · 15 kt TAIL, 11 kt x-left
20 50% 2600 ft · 15 kt head, 11 kt x-right
Why — evidence behind this answer

Runway 2

Runway 20

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METAROK 53444 min
ADSBUNAVAILABLE No ADS-B track history here yet
NOTAMOK
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (No ADS-B track history here yet)

Was this right?

PAJC field & runways

Chignik, Chignik, Alaska. Field elevation 18 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT). Magnetic variation 16.0°E on record, 10.7°E today.

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.228°/year west — about 1° every 4 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
2 34.4° 23.7° matches rule gives runway 3 in ~6 yr 2,600 ft GRAVEL left
20 214.4° 203.7° matches rule gives runway 21 in ~6 yr 2,600 ft GRAVEL left

Generated 08:39:30Z · auto-refreshes · JSON