runwayinuse

W52 Goheen

?
UNKNOWN

Unknown — not enough evidence to call a runway

We don't know, and saying so beats guessing. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency.

certainty: — evidence: NONE no tower now

N 33 15

Wind 310° true at 4 kt · VFR · 47 min old · from KHIO (23.1 nm away)

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

33 32% 2565 ft · 3 kt head, 2 kt x-left
25 25% 1500 ft
7 25% 1500 ft
15 18% 2565 ft · 3 kt TAIL, 2 kt x-right
Why — evidence behind this answer

Runway 33

Runway 25

Runway 7

Runway 15

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METAROK 47 min Nearest station KHIO (23.1 nm away)
ADSBOK 11 min MODERATE
NOTAMOK
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour.

Was this right?

W52 field & runways

Goheen, Battle Ground, Washington. Field elevation 292 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT). Magnetic variation 20.0°E on record, 14.5°E today.

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.117°/year west — about 1° every 9 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
15 164.8° 150.3° matches rule gives runway 16 in ~40 yr 2,565 ft TURF left
25 not published — 1,500 ft TURF
33 344.8° 330.3° matches rule gives runway 34 in ~40 yr 2,565 ft TURF left
7 not published — 1,500 ft TURF

Generated 08:40:26Z · auto-refreshes · JSON