runwayinuse

7IA7 Mitchell Fld

6
WIND_INFERRED 70%

Runway 6 — favored by the wind (5 kt at 100° true)

Based on wind only — no traffic or ATIS to confirm. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. No ADS-B traffic data available.

certainty: 70% evidence: NONE no tower now

N 6 24

Wind 100° true at 5 kt · VFR · 39 min old · from KCCY (13.2 nm away)

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

6 72% 1500 ft · 4 kt head, 4 kt x-right
24 28% 1500 ft · 4 kt TAIL, 4 kt x-left
Why — evidence behind this answer

Runway 6

Runway 24

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METAROK 39 min Nearest station KCCY (13.2 nm away)
ADSBUNAVAILABLE No ADS-B track history here yet
NOTAMOK
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (No ADS-B track history here yet)

Was this right?

7IA7 field & runways

Mitchell Fld, New Hampton, Iowa. Field elevation 1173 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT). Private use. Magnetic variation 2.0°E on record, 0.8°W today.

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.045°/year west — about 1° every 22 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
24 235.9° 236.7° matches 1,500 ft CONC
6 55.9° 56.7° matches 1,500 ft CONC

Generated 09:13:54Z · auto-refreshes · JSON