runwayinuse

H81 River Falls

?
UNKNOWN

Unknown — not enough evidence to call a runway

We don't know, and saying so beats guessing. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. No ADS-B traffic data available. No weather observation available.

certainty: — evidence: NONE no tower now

N 17 35 22 4

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

17 27% 6015 ft
35 27% 6015 ft · right traffic
22 23% 3200 ft
4 23% 3200 ft · right traffic
Why — evidence behind this answer

Runway 17

Runway 35

Runway 22

Runway 4

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METARUNAVAILABLE No weather observation found
ADSBUNAVAILABLE No ADS-B track history here yet
NOTAMOK
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (No ADS-B track history here yet)

Was this right?

H81 field & runways

River Falls, Amarillo, Texas. Field elevation 3585 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT).

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.077°/year west — about 1° every 13 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
17 180.0° 174.6° matches rule gives runway 18 in ~6 yr 6,015 ft ASPH
22 224.5° 219.1° matches 3,200 ft TURF
35 0.0° 354.6° matches rule gives runway 36 in ~6 yr 6,015 ft ASPH right
4 44.5° 39.1° matches 3,200 ft TURF right

Generated 10:21:05Z · auto-refreshes · JSON