runwayinuse

KGAB Gabbs

?
UNKNOWN

Unknown — not enough evidence to call a runway

We don't know, and saying so beats guessing. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. No ADS-B traffic data available. No weather observation available.

certainty: — evidence: NONE no tower now

N 27 9 16 34

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

27 27% 5950 ft
9 27% 5950 ft
16 23% 2650 ft
34 23% 2650 ft
Why — evidence behind this answer

Runway 27

Runway 9

Runway 16

Runway 34

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METARUNAVAILABLE No weather observation found
ADSBUNAVAILABLE No ADS-B track history here yet
NOTAMOK
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (No ADS-B track history here yet)

Was this right?

KGAB field & runways

Gabbs, Gabbs, Nevada. Field elevation 4699 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT). Magnetic variation 15.0°E on record, 12.2°E today.

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.089°/year west — about 1° every 11 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
16 175.1° 162.9° matches rule gives runway 17 in ~23 yr 2,650 ft DIRT
27 280.7° 268.5° matches 5,950 ft DIRT left
34 355.1° 342.9° matches rule gives runway 35 in ~23 yr 2,650 ft DIRT
9 100.7° 88.5° matches 5,950 ft DIRT left

Generated 09:45:26Z · auto-refreshes · JSON