runwayinuse

KIPL Imperial County

26
PROBABLE 60%

Runway 26 — wind slightly favors it, low confidence

Based mostly on wind; no traffic or ATIS to confirm. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. No ADS-B traffic data available. Weather observation is 111 minutes old — treat with caution.

certainty: 60% evidence: NONE no tower now Class E

N 26 8 32 14

Wind 280° true at 7 kt · VFR · 111 min old

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

26 55% 4501 ft · 7 kt head, 1 kt x-right · right traffic
32 39% 5308 ft · 4 kt head, 6 kt x-left · right traffic
14 5% 5308 ft · 4 kt TAIL, 6 kt x-right
8 1% 4501 ft · 7 kt TAIL, 1 kt x-left

Active NOTAMs affecting runways

APCH OTS until 11-02 19:15Z
IAP IMPERIAL COUNTY, IMPERIAL, CA. VOR-A, AMDT 5... ALTERNATE MINIMUMS NA EXCEPT FOR ACFT EQUIPPED WITH SUITABLE RNAV SYSTEM WITH GPS, IPL VORTAC UNMONITORED.
LIGHTING RWY 32 until 10-23 01:00Z
RWY 32 PAPI U/S
Why — evidence behind this answer

Runway 26

Runway 32

Runway 14

Runway 8

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METAROK 111 min
ADSBUNAVAILABLE No ADS-B track history here yet
NOTAMOK
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (No ADS-B track history here yet)

Was this right?

KIPL field & runways

Imperial County, Imperial, California. Field elevation -54 ft. Class E airspace. Non-towered (NON-ATCT). Magnetic variation 10.0°E on record, 10.5°E today.

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.075°/year west — about 1° every 13 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
14 152.8° 142.3° matches rule gives runway 15 in ~36 yr 5,308 ft ASPH left
26 270.0° 259.5° matches 4,501 ft ASPH right
32 332.8° 322.3° matches rule gives runway 33 in ~36 yr 5,308 ft ASPH right
8 90.0° 79.5° matches 4,501 ft ASPH

Generated 09:43:33Z · auto-refreshes · JSON