runwayinuse

S01 Conrad

?
UNKNOWN

Unknown — not enough evidence to call a runway

We don't know, and saying so beats guessing. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. No ADS-B traffic data available. No weather observation available.

certainty: — evidence: NONE no tower now

N 24 6 15 33

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

24 26% 4602 ft
6 26% 4602 ft
15 24% 2800 ft
33 24% 2800 ft
Why — evidence behind this answer

Runway 24

Runway 6

Runway 15

Runway 33

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METARUNAVAILABLE No weather observation found
ADSBUNAVAILABLE No ADS-B track history here yet
NOTAMOK
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (No ADS-B track history here yet)

Was this right?

S01 field & runways

Conrad, Conrad, Montana. Field elevation 3548 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT). Magnetic variation 12.0°E on record, 11.9°E today.

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.103°/year west — about 1° every 10 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
15 162.9° 151.0° matches rule gives runway 16 in ~39 yr 2,800 ft TURF left
24 250.2° 238.3° matches 4,602 ft ASPH
33 342.9° 331.0° matches rule gives runway 34 in ~39 yr 2,800 ft TURF left
6 70.2° 58.3° matches 4,602 ft ASPH

Generated 09:43:15Z · auto-refreshes · JSON