runwayinuse

E14 Ohkay Owingeh

16
WIND_INFERRED 70%

Runway 16 — favored by the wind (5 kt at 130° true)

Based on wind only — no traffic or ATIS to confirm. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. No ADS-B traffic data available.

certainty: 70% evidence: NONE no tower now

N 16 34

Wind 130° true at 5 kt · VFR · 48 min old · from KSAF (25.0 nm away)

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

16 72% 5007 ft · 4 kt head, 3 kt x-left
34 28% 5007 ft · 4 kt TAIL, 3 kt x-right
Why — evidence behind this answer

Runway 16

Runway 34

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METAROK 48 min Nearest station KSAF (25.0 nm away)
ADSBUNAVAILABLE No ADS-B track history here yet
NOTAMOK
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (No ADS-B track history here yet)

Was this right?

E14 field & runways

Ohkay Owingeh, Espanola, New Mexico. Field elevation 5760 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT). Magnetic variation 11.0°E on record, 7.6°E today.

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.079°/year west — about 1° every 13 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
16 170.9° 163.2° matches rule gives runway 17 in ~22 yr 5,007 ft ASPH left
34 350.9° 343.2° matches rule gives runway 35 in ~22 yr 5,007 ft ASPH left

Generated 08:40:53Z · auto-refreshes · JSON